DraftExpress NBA Draft Prospect Profile: Jerome Jordan, Stats, Comparisons, and Outlook
Draftexpress
Login:Remember:  Register | Lost Pass
 
Jerome Jordan
Top 25s - Full List
RankCategoryTotal
23PER29
22TS%64
16EFF/4028.1
21WS/4014
11Reb/40p13
18Reb/4012.7
25DRB/g6.1
8DRB/40p9.3
11DRB/409.1
19DRB220
Team: Tulsa, Senior
PhysicalsPositionsRankings Misc
H: 7' 0"
W: 235 lbs
Bday: 09/29/1986
(23 Years Old)
Current: C
NBA:   C
Possible: C
Round: 1 Pick: 22 in 2010 Mock Draft
Rank 2 in NCAA Seniors
Rank 24 in Top 100 Prospects
High School: Florida Air Academy
Hometown: Kingston, Jamaica
Best Case: Theo Ratliff
Worst Case: Dwayne Jones
Basic Per Game Statistics - Comprehensive Stats - Statistical Top 25s
YearLeagueNameGPMinPtsFGFGAFG%2Pt2PtA2P%3Pt3PtA3P%FTMFTAFT%OffDefTOTAstsStlsBlksTOsPFs
2008/09NCAAJerome Jordan3627.013.85.08.558.65.08.558.60.00.0 3.85.273.72.46.18.60.90.42.52.43.1
Player Blog  |  Player Stats  |  Mock Draft History  |  Related Articles  |  Add to My Draft Express    
LeBron James Skills Academy Player Profiles
July 13, 2009
-Jerome Jordan-Seeing is believing when it comes to Jerome Jordan, as there might not be a player in this year’s draft class who makes a stronger initial impression on first glance. His physical tools are amazing, starting with his legit 7-feet size, his excellent frame, or his pterodactyl 7-6 wingspan. When it came to the actual games or drills, though, it was a whole different story. Jordan showed flashes of potential with the way he finished around the rim, but for the most part he looked clumsy or not focused (depending on your perspective) trying to make catches with his so-so hands, and also seemed very lethargic in the competitive part of the drills. He may be a little bit too laid back for his own good, prompting one scout in attendance to go as far as to call him “a less athletic Patrick O’Bryant.” We wouldn’t go quite that far, but Jordan definitely needs to show a higher intensity level if he wants to justify passing up being the 2nd or 3rd best center in the 2009 draft by returning to Tulsa for his senior year.
[Read Full Article]

NCAA Weekly Performers, 3/9/09
March 10, 2009
After coming on strong towards the end of his sophomore campaign, Jerome Jordan has taken his game to the next level as a junior, increasing his production and efficiency in a number of areas, while still playing the same amount of minutes. Jordan started off the year slowly but really came on strong once conference play kicked off, upping his scoring averages to over 17 points per game.

The most apparent area you can see Jordan’s improvement is on the offensive end, where he looks much more comfortable in the post compared to last season, having a stronger repertoire of moves and better recognition of how to use them. Jordan’s game still lacks obvious polish in the post, however he has established a versatile groundwork of moves to use, showing flashes of jump hooks, turnaround jumpers, and drop steps with range out to 8 feet and the ability to turn off either shoulder to execute his moves. While Jordan looks quite awkward at times in the post, his footwork given his lack of experience and his coordination given his undeveloped strength are both things to be encouraged about.

Jordan’s best move at this stage would have to be his right-handed hook shot, which he shows nice touch on and range out to 6 or 7 feet. Aside from that and drop steps deep in the post, however, Jordan’s is just inconsistently successful with his other moves, especially against defenders who can match up with him physically—unfortunately very few and far between in the conference he plays in. Jordan also needs a lot of work on moves with his left hand, and he reacts very poorly to double teams, often leading to turnovers. Jordan’s footwork is good enough to get the job done when he gets matched up with his defender on an island, however in the tight spaces created but double teams, his lack of polish becomes painfully evident. Jordan’s underdeveloped strength also becomes apparent when he’s getting bodied up, throwing off his finesse moves. Jordan shows flashes of power moves in the post, having the size, extension, and athleticism to dunk over players from a few feet away from the basket, but he needs more lower and upper body strength to consistently take advantage of this, while he may also lack a mean streak.

As for the rest of Jordan’s offense, he does a good job on the offensive boards, taking advantage of his size and showing the mobility and hands to track down some rebounds, while he’s also capable of catching and finishing at the basket, even though he isn’t used much on pick-and-roll plays in college. Jordan doesn’t show much of a jump shot yet, but his 76% free-throw shooting (up from 69%) and solid form from the line suggest he should be able to add a mid-range jumper in time. As a passer, Jordan does show decent court awareness from the post, however he is prone to making bad decisions and he definitely can get flustered when reacting to double teams.

Defensively, Jordan hasn’t been as effective a shot blocker this season as last, but he still ranks 8th in our database per 40 minutes pace adjusted, using his size and timing to swat away a decent number of shots. Jordan’s improved nicely with his man-to-man defense, however, showing good patience and decent fundamentals in the post, always keeping his hands up and using his length to force tough shots. He is prone to being backed down at times with his high center of gravity and still developing body, but he’s showing signs of improvement. Jordan also shows potential hedging pick-and-rolls, showing great mobility for his size and flashes of surprising ability to change directions at decent speed without losing balance. He is still a bit too foul prone, averaging just under 5 fouls per-game per-40, which is definitely a concern considering the type of big men he typically faces.

Jordan’s level of competition also has to be taken into consideration, as many of his Conference USA opponents lack the frontcourt players to give him much of a challenge, and his production and efficiency levels were inconsistent against major conference competition, especially those with strong, physical big men.

Looking forward, Jordan is still quite a raw player, lacking experience, polish, and not having a fully developed body just yet, but the pieces he’s added to his game and the improvements he’s made in multiple areas in such a short time should be very encouraging to many talent evaluators, as his learning curve appears to be very steep. Jordan still has some work to do before he would be able to consistently contribute in the NBA, and in the long term he’d likely be best served by spending another year in school expanding his game, but teams would have a tough time passing on a player with his physical tools and upside in the mid to late portion of the first round, making the draft a potentially enticing option.
[Read Full Article]

College Road Report: Tulsa vs Ohio University
December 8, 2008
Statistically, it would appear that Jerome Jordan was a relative non-factor based on his pedestrian 7 points, 6 rebounds, and 2 blocks in 24 minutes on the hardwood. However, the impact that Jordan had on the game extended far beyond the box score.

The first thing that stands out about seeing Jordan in person is the outstanding physical package that he has to offer. He combines a condor-esque wingspan with a massive frame that could easily add a considerable amount of weight to it, which is pretty impressive considering he already weighs 240 pounds. He has a very strong lower body already at this point, leaving the bulk of his physical growth to be absorbed in his upper body.

Given Ohio University’s lack of a legitimate inside presence Jordan’s sheer size and the fact that he could score on the block made coach John Groce divert from his usual strategy and go with a 2-3 zone that was packed in the key. This defensive attack was very successful in limiting the touches the athletic Jordan received in the pivot, especially in the first half.



In the few instances that Jordan did receive the ball on the blocks, he was immediately double teamed by a pair of Ohio University players and forced to make a quick decision. While there were a few times that he identified the double team quickly and made a pass to a guard on the weak side, there were also times were he made awful decisions, resulting in his season high 3 turnovers.

With the opportunities quite limited to see Jordan’s scoring moves in person (he only attempted four shots), there wasn’t a whole lot that could be absorbed about his ability to score on the blocks. He did give you glimpses with a gorgeous right hand jump hook, in which he had outstanding extension. The Jamaica native also had a tip-dunk from a standstill and showed off some nice footwork with an up and under move that he finished at the rim. Nothing spectacular, but pretty impressive for a considerably raw, athletic seven footer.

Certainly a work in progress on the offensive end, Jordan is far from on the defensive side of things. He completely changed the game every second he was in against Ohio University with his ability to alter/block shots. He displayed the ability to stay on the ground and not bite for pump fakes against his much smaller frontcourt oppositions, displaying great timing and patience in this area.

After struggling considerably with defending the pick and roll last season, he has shown considerable improvement this year. Jordan had no problem hedging out on ball screens and then quickly recovering, showing impressive lateral quickness in the mean time. Jordan’s defensive rotations were also far better then last season, leading one to believe that he is beginning to understand the game a bit more given his lack of inexperience playing at a high level.

Jordan did a solid job of rebounding the ball, taking up two players on either end of the court. He exhibited more defensive fundamentals in terms of boxing out, leaving his teammates to corral many loose rebounds. On the offensive glass, he crashed very hard throughout the game despite the fact that he constantly had two players putting a body on him in effort to negate his presence.

Limited to only 24 minutes of action due to foul trouble, Jerome picked up a few questionable foul calls throughout the game. All of Jordan’s fouls basically came on smaller post players barreling themselves into the seven footer, completely initiating the contact. Jordan’s lack of upper body strength hindered him severely in this area.

Jordan displayed a pretty good demeanor on the court, visibly playing hard and running the floor as hard as he could. Like Hasheem Thabeet, Jordan runs the floor fairly awkwardly (but effectively). The junior really battled to establish (and maintain) position on both blocks despite his poor strength.

Overall, the biggest observation that we could draw from watching Jordan in person was the impact that he can have on a game that doesn’t show up in the stat sheets. There is still no doubt that Jordan is far from a finished product and needs to improve considerably before he can make an impact on an NBA team. However, it is also impossible to deny the athletic gifts the seven footer has and how good he could potentially become down the road.
[Read Full Article]

Top NBA Draft Prospects in the Non-BCS Conferences (Part Two: #6-15)
November 13, 2008
After averaging just 2.7 points and 2.1 rebounds in under 8 minutes per game as a freshman, no one in America could have projected Jerome Jordan to develop into one of the top mid-major prospects in college basketball. That’s exactly what he did, though, after improving his sophomore numbers to a more respectable 10.5 points, 7.9 rebounds and, most importantly, 3.7 blocks, in 26 minutes per game. Considering his physical tools, and realizing that he’s only really going into his third season of organized basketball (he barely played in high school after transferring from his native country of Jamaica to Redemption Christian Academy in New York to Florida Air Academy, where he was deemed ineligible) there is a lot to get excited about if Jordan can make another similar leap in ability this season.

Jordan passes the airport test and then some, standing a legit 7-feet, with a very good frame, a pterodactyl wingspan, and solid athleticism. He is quick off his feet, and runs the court well, looking particularly impressive finishing plays with ease around the basket. In terms of physical attributes, he looks the part and then some.

Offensively, Jordan is mostly a non-factor at this point in his development. He sees little to no touches inside the paint, and displays poor footwork when he does get the ball, possessing nothing more than a basic drop-step move and a developing jump-hook shot with his right hand. His touch does not look bad, and his hands appear to be fairly reliable, which at least leaves some room for optimism regarding the future considering how little basketball experience he has. He was able to up his free throw percentage from a dismal 27% as a freshman to 69% last season, although we never got a chance to see him attempt a mid-range jumper or put the ball on the floor—things that are very likely out of his repertoire at the moment.

Jordan appears to understand that his place is in the paint, and thus seems to want to play inside, which is a pretty good sign. Something that is holding him back considerably, though, besides his incredibly obvious lack of polish, is the very poor strength he possesses at the moment. He is not strong enough to hold his spot on the block, and really struggles trying to finish through contact. He gets pushed around with ease by unimposing college players, which means he will have to bulk up substantially if he’s to have any chance at competing in the post against NBA big men.

Defensively is where Jordan shows the most potential as a prospect. He seems to have nice timing, which combined with his freakishly long wingspan, allows him to block shots at a very high rate. He currently ranks as the 2nd best returning shot-blocker in college basketball in fact. Jordan seems to compete fairly hard, although he lacks a significant amount of strength, experience and awareness on this end of the floor, making him very foul prone, and a bit naïve biting for pump-fakes. He struggles stepping away from the basket to hedge screens and such, and doesn’t possess a great understanding of the nuances of team defense, making him a step slow at times rotating from the weak side.

Jordan is a very good offensive rebounder thanks to his excellent physical tools and above average activity level, but he’s not quite as effective a defensive rebounder. He gets boxed out pretty easily and struggles to fight back when being pushed around—Joey Dorsey gave him a very hard time for example in all three of their matchups last season.

If history has taught us anything, it’s to be patient with projects like Jordan, and avoid the urge to overhype. He needs a good amount of time and development to even begin to reach his full potential as a basketball player, even if the tools he displays are impossible to ignore. Jordan will surely play in the NBA down the road—the question is how soon, and in what capacity. How much he’s improved this offseason should tell us a fair amount, as he’s still very much an unknown commodity at the moment.
[Read Full Article]

Blogging through Championship Week (Part Five)
March 18, 2008
A mobile seven footer that’s largely gone under the radar to this point, the sophomore really turned it on to close the season, averaging 16.3 points, 12 rebounds, and 4.8 blocks over his final six games, though he also averaged an impressive 3.7 blocks per game for the season, in just 25 minutes per game.

Jordan had a good showing against Memphis, even though his team wasn’t in the game from the start, scoring 17 points along with 9 rebounds and 4 blocks. His first offensive possession left me shaking my head, as he caught the ball on the deep right block, matched with Joey Dorsey, and strangely tried to drop-step baseline, looking very awkward and traveling with the ball as he simply had nowhere to go. Later in the game, it became clear what he was trying to do, as he went back to the same move twice. On these next two attempts, though, Jordan executed the drop-step and got underneath the rim, finishing with a reverse lay-up on one attempt and a reverse dunk on the other, showing off just how mobile and long he really is.

While the moves were pretty impressive, it’s worth noting the third one came in the game’s final minutes when Memphis had emptied the bench and Jordan had a 6’8, 300 pounder guarding him in Memphis’ Pierre Niles., who didn’t really try to defend the move. Also, it’s a bit strange that a player with his physical tools and fairly raw overall post game would have a move of this difficulty as his go-to move. It’s also puzzling how Jordan kept going to the deep right block to get position, when he didn’t show any moves off his right shoulder (though he faked it multiple times), yet never tried to post up on the deep left block, where with his size, he could consistently utilize a hook shot across the lane that would be pretty much unblockable. Looking at his post game as a whole, he has nice touch and clearly has a lot of potential, but it’d be nice to see him develop some better post awareness in his future and make better use of simpler, easier moves that he could abuse defenses with.

As for the rest of his offensive game, Jordan got open around the rim to finish with his size and touch often, notably finishing on one alley-oop dunk where he showed very nice coordination, and he also hit a right-handed hook shot off the glass from the right block on one occasion. He didn’t show any mid-range game, though he’s shooting a decent 69% on free throw attempts on the season, and his shooting form doesn’t look bad. Continuing to improve on his free throws and rounding out his post game should be among his priorities offensively moving forward.

On the defensive end, Jordan showed excellent timing on his shot blocks, using his great length and size to consistently patrol the painted area. His elevation isn’t great, but his mobility and size make up for that, and he’s clearly not at his athletic peak yet, not having much muscle mass. His shoulders aren’t particularly broad, so he’ll be someone limited in how much bulk he can add, but he still can improve significantly here. With man-to-man defense, Jordan looked good in the post, contesting and blocking shots with his length, but he didn’t show much in terms of fundamentals, not really bodying up and mostly relying on his shot-blocking abilities.

All in all, Jordan is an extremely raw and extremely intriguing player, and it’ll be interesting to watch him develop in the next two seasons. He still has a long ways to go on all aspects of the game, but with his size and length, he obviously has the potential to play in the NBA when it’s all said and done, and maybe even more than that if he makes some serious strides this summer.
[Read Full Article]

© 2007 DraftExpress LLC All rights reserved.